“After the Wedding” (2006) begins on the streets of
Mumbai, India, where several orphaned, homeless children are queuing up
for food, courtesy ‘Anand Orphanage and School’, assisted by Jacob
(Mads Mikkelsen) who has taken up the cause. He teaches in the school
attached to the orphanage, and is a favorite with the children there.
The initial scenes make one wonder if this is yet another ‘poverty porn’
focusing only on the dirty underbelly of India and projecting it to be a
country worse than it actually is (Think “Slumdog Millionaire”). But
any negativity formed in the beginning is quickly quashed with what
follows.
The
orphanage is clearly falling short of funds. A silver lining is seen,
as some tycoon in Denmark, by the name of Jorgen Hansson (Rolf
Lassgård), has agreed to offer a huge sum of money as donation to the
orphanage, but only on the condition that Jacob travel to Denmark
personally, meet with Jorgen and then return with the necessary funds
and paperwork. This tiny detail offered in the beginning, highlights the
whimsical nature of the wealthy businessman’s offer, and immediately
hints at a catch, so we begin to brace ourselves for an early twist. Any
surprise quotient, then, is automatically reduced to half.
Jacob
travels to Denmark, leaving behind his shanty life, albeit promising
one of the orphan boys, Pramod (Neeral Mulchandani), who he has brought
up and loves like his son, that he would be back in a week. Once in
Denmark, Jacob is given red carpet treatment; a personal airport pickup,
a luxury suite in a posh hotel, and later a meeting with the man
himself; who takes a look at the project put together by Jacob (a
videotape detailing the activities of the orphanage), but seems to be
more interested in having a drink with him. Jorgen turns off the tape
halfway, leaving Jacob stumped and disappointed, but proceeds to invite
Jacob to the upcoming wedding of his daughter Anna (Stine Fischer
Christensen). The unsuspecting Jacob accepts the invitation and shows up
at Jorgen’s plush mansion, the venue of the wedding.
But
a series of startling discoveries at the wedding and after it, make
this visit to Denmark, a life-changing experience for Jacob…..
Writer-Director
Susanne Bier’s screenplay shows great promise, at least in the first
half, thanks to the periodic revelations. Some dark secrets are
revealed at regular intervals, and thus the pace is well maintained ‘til
then, although the film revolves only around four major characters.
There are great moments of power-packed drama, sometimes intense,
sometimes warm, sometimes awkward; mostly the uncomfortable encounters
between characters are very naturally captured; it couldn’t get more
real than that. The director knows exactly how the characters would
emote under the circumstances, and thanks to the terrific actors, it’s
all well done and earnestly acted. The cinematography is somewhat
grainy, mostly devoid of the usage of special lighting, and is shot on a
handheld camera, reminiscent of the style of the Dogme 95 movement
first initiated by Lars Von Trier. It is no surprise that the filming of
the entire wedding sequence very much reminds of that in Von Trier’s
“Breaking the Waves”.
It
is the extreme close-ups of eyes, lips, hands, and even some facial
hair that come across as an eyesore. There are way too many close-ups
that just weren’t required and suit neither the genre, nor the subject
matter. In fact they take away from the scenes somewhat, by not showing
us the visage of the actor during a scene, when his/her reaction or
emotion is vital to the scene. It is in the latter half, that the drama
begins to shed the subtlety, when the most important twist of the story
is revealed, and the film dips into mawkish melodrama giving rise to
histrionics and gawky over-sentimentality! The major twist is itself a
cliché and a bankable ingredient for a weepy soap opera. But there are
other events that follow, and at such timings, that you can’t help but
think that the screenplay is taking an emotionally manipulative
direction, by forcing some events that just weren’t necessary, but used
merely because they, somehow, serve as good excuses to make the
proceedings sappier!
That
said, it is indeed noteworthy, how almost all the characters are very
well written; they have a lot of depth and more importantly, the initial
impression that is created about them, takes a drastic turn in some key
events, and we are forced to see them in a different light. Of course,
the convincing dynamics of the characters, are owing to the choice of
actors that are immensely talented. Mads Mikkelsen brings a range of
emotions to the otherwise stoic Jacob who is taken aback when he first
learns of the shattering truth that hits like a bolt of lightning. Ditto
for the mixed emotions and the inevitable awkwardness he displays,
later, in one of the best directed scenes of the film. Rolf Lassgård is
brilliant as the drunk, but loving father and business tycoon, whose
real intentions, and hence the kind of person he is, becomes clear only
later. Stine Fischer Christensen is cute and does a commendable job as
the daughter Anna who gets a double whammy of deceit. And then we have
Sidse Babett Knudsen as Helene, who finds herself in an extraordinary
situation, by a twist of fate, following a seemingly strange
coincidence, and a past that refuses to let go. It is a classy
performance indeed.
What
“After the Wedding” needed was a steady grip and restrained tone, that
it maintains in the first half of the film, despite the plot
contrivances, after which it nosedives into unnecessary melodrama and
starts to come undone. Too bad, really!
Score: 7/10







I like to your post. Thank you so much for taking the time to share such a nice information
ReplyDeletebest wedding photographers in delhi
best wedding cinematography